Legal Opinion

Edwards v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 2001No. 98-CO-1079PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Timothy G. Edwards appeals from an order denying without a hearing Edwards’ motion to vacate his guilty plea. Edwards asks that we set aside his convictions, contending that at the time of his plea he suffered from a mental defect resulting from brain damage, that he did not understand the nature and consequences of his plea due to a brain injury, and that the plea proceeding was fundamentally flawed because he did not have the benefit of effective counsel, and the trial court failed to determine whether there was a factual basis for the plea. The government contends that Edwards’ plea was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. McClurkin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Southall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DaughtryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Wallace v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Elwell v. ElwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Maske v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Howard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API