Legal Opinion

TAITZ v. Astrue

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 17, 2011No. Civil Action 11-402 (RCL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [21]. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion, plaintiffs opposition [31], the reply thereto [32], the entire record herein, and the applicable law, the Court will grant summary judgment in defendant’s favor for the reasons set forth below.

I. BACKGROUND

Ever persistent, plaintiff has once again come before this Court in an effort to uncover “the biggest cover up in the history of this nation.” Pl.’s Opp’n to Mot. for Summ. J. 20 [31]. She believes that the President is using a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. National Archives & Records Administration v. FavishSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States Department of Defense v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Weisberg v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strunk v. United States Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Archibald v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API