Legal Opinion

McDowell v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 23, 1920No. 10377PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action by Gilmore McDowell against the Southern Railway Company. Order of nonsuit, and plaintiff appeals. submits: The defendant is liable if the injury was caused by the negligence of the servants of defendant or by defective appliances, etc.: Fed-feral Employers’ Liability Act, sec. 1. A servant does not assume the risk-of injuries occasioned by the master’s negligence’, neither is contributory negligence available to defendant except to reduce the amount of damages:…

Read the full summary

Action by Gilmore McDowell against the Southern Railway Company. Order of nonsuit, and plaintiff appeals. submits: The defendant is liable if the injury was caused by the negligence of the servants of defendant or by defective appliances, etc.: Fed-feral Employers’ Liability Act, sec. 1. A servant does not assume the risk-of injuries occasioned by the master’s negligence’, neither is contributory negligence available to defendant except to reduce the amount of damages: Federal Employers’ Liability Act, sections 3 and 4; 98 S. C. 348; 223 U. S. 34; 56 L. Ed. 327; 98 S. C. 125. The risk, if…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chiee ■Justice Gary.

This is an action for damages under the interstate commerce law, and the appeal is from order of nonsuit. The complaint alleges:

“ (1) That at the times hereinafter mentioned the defendant was and now is.,a railroad corporation owning property within the State and now operating freight and passenger trains as a common carrier for hire in Cherokee county, S. C., and other parts of the State, and into and from other States; has a freight and passenger office at Blacksburg, with agents therein. That plaintiff is a resident and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Hicks v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  4. Levister v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  5. Branch v. Port Royal &c. Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hamilton Ridge Lumber Corp. v. Boston InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. Galphin v. Pioneer Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Brown v. Walker Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  4. Harrison v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  5. Wescott v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API