Legal Opinion

United States v. Caro-Quintero

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 26, 1991No. CR 87-422(F)-ERPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

RAFEEDIE, District Judge.

This matter came for hearing on defendants’ motions for new trial based upon allegations of jury misconduct. The Court, having read and considered all the papers filed regarding those motions and having considered oral argument, gave an oral ruling at the hearing denying defendants’ motions, stating a summary of its reasons. The Court issues this memorandum decision to set forth in fuller detail the reasons for the Court’s denial of the motions.

INTRODUCTION

This cause came before the Court on defendants’ motions for a new trial for juror misconduct…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. DavoltArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ramon MATTA-BALLESTEROS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. State v. DickensArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. United States v. Rex Henley, Rafael Bustamante, Willie McGowan and Garey WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. StraightCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API