Legal Opinion

Rusk v. Sowerwine

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 15, 1810PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Baltimore County Court. Replevin for a slave. The appellant was the plaintiff below. General issue atid limitations were pleaded. ’ 1. The plaintiff offered evidence, that John Bailey, being in his life-time possessed of a negro woman named Hannah, and being indebted to Daniel Dulany, deceased, to secure the debt, on the 12th of April 1769 executed a mortgage to Dulany of said negro slave, and other property, which was duly acknowledged and recorded, and was…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Baltimore County Court. Replevin for a slave. The appellant was the plaintiff below. General issue atid limitations were pleaded. ’ 1. The plaintiff offered evidence, that John Bailey, being in his life-time possessed of a negro woman named Hannah, and being indebted to Daniel Dulany, deceased, to secure the debt, on the 12th of April 1769 executed a mortgage to Dulany of said negro slave, and other property, which was duly acknowledged and recorded, and was offered in evidence. And to prove that the slave in controversy was a descendant from Hannah, the plaintiff offered as a…

1Opinion of the Court

The Court

agreed with the court below in the opinions expressed in both of the bills of exceptions,

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.,

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morrison v. WeltyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API