Legal Opinion
Ingle v. Mark
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Fitzpatrick, J.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by reason of the negligence of the defendants, the corporate defendants All-State Vehicle Rentals Corp. and All-State Auto Rental Corp. move, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7) to dismiss the second cause of action in behalf of the infant plaintiff.
Defendant Mark was operating an automobile which had been 0 leased from defendant All-State Vehicle Rentals Corp., which has allegedly merged with defendant All-State Auto Rental Corp., when he allegedly ’struck the plaintiff. The second cause of action alleged in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamilton v. . Third Avenue Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Mills v. GabrielNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Mills v. GabrielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Hogan v. Comac Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Hogan v. Comac Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Poulard v. PapamihlopoulosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1990
- Padlo v. SpoorNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Marcoux v. Farm Service and Supplies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.