Legal Opinion

State v. Vanderpool

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 8, 1986No. 85-K-2110PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

493 So.2d 574 (1986)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

David R. VANDERPOOL.

No. 85-K-2110.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 8, 1986.

Ronald Dewhirst, Martin E. Regan, Jr., New Orleans, for applicant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Francis Dugas, Dist. Atty., Louis Thad Toups, Asst. Dist. Atty., for respondent.

DIXON, Chief Justice.

Vanderpool was charged by bill of information with armed robbery and requested trial by jury. During voir dire he sought to have a deputy sheriff excused from the venire for cause. The trial judge denied the motion, stating, "A deputy sheriff…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Calogero; Concurrence · Calogero.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  2. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  3. State v. BoutteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  4. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  5. State v. VanderpoolLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. State v. CopelandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. State v. RossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. State v. HallalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  5. State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API