Legal Opinion

Ballard v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1938No. 6 Div. 365PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

In Gholston v. State, 221 Ala. 556, 130 So. 69, the holding' was, as to section 8662 of the Code, that it confers on the parties the right, under directions of the court, to further examine the jurors within proper bounds to ascertain “any matter that might tend to affect their verdict.” But, says the opinion, “this section does not empower the party to require the court to put such questions to the jury, even when properly framed.” (Page 70.) When there is no showing to the contrary, the presumption is always in favor of correct action on the part of the trial judge. Bragan…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Gholston v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Bragan v. Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Travis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Roan v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Seals v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Leach v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Gratton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API