Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dunlop v. Levin, Kronenberg & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1909Published

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the plaintiff, rendered on the 12th day of May, 1909.

1DissentWoodward, J.

The defendant, on the 8tli day of July, 1908, entered into an indemnity bond, in which it undertook to pay one-third of any sums which Jacob Schwartz and Edward Dunlop, as parties of the second part, might be called upon to pay by reason of the execution and delivery of their bonds to procure the discharge of certain mechanics’ liens under the provisions of the Mechanics’ Lien Law (Laws of 1897, chap. 418), as supplemented bjr section 812 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the liability being limited to §500. Subsequently Schwartz and Dunlop were sued upon their bonds, and a judgment was entered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. . Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API