Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 17, 1992No. 92-1216PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court summarily denied the motion as untimely. Appellant’s judgment and sentence were not final for purposes of rule 3.850 until this court issued its mandate in the direct appeal on October 12, 1990. See Huff v. State, 569 So.2d 1247, 1250 (Fla.1990); Ferris v. State, 575 So.2d 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Therefore, we find that appellant’s November 19, 1991, motion was timely filed within the two year period provided by rule 3.850. Accordingly, this cause…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Ferris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Interest of JMDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API