Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 3, 1936No. 6433, 6587PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

The above actions at law present the same issue. They were tried together upon stipulations and testimony, and may conveniently be disposed of in one opinion. The plaintiffs in each of the actions represent testators who, in 1932, owned stock in the Atlantic National Bank. In each case the plaintiffs seek to recover income tax assessed and paid upon 1932 income of his respective testator. The sole controversy is whether the taxpayer was entitled to deduct from the gross income the cost of his shares in the bank as a loss deductible under section 23 (e), of the Revenue…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Lewellyn v. Electric Reduction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Royal Packing Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  5. Forbes v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  2. Bancroft v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  3. G. E. Employees Securities Corp. v. ManningDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
  4. Brumder v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API