Legal Opinion

Reis v. Phillips Products Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1975No. Appeal, No. 105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This case raises questions concerning the respective rights and duties in both assumpsit and trespass of a corporation and its employee-participants arising out of an executed retirement plan. The present state of the record, however, and the posture of the appeal compel a remand to the trial court and prevent us from considering the substantive merits involved.

The facts of record are not in dispute. On August 28, 1958, Skyline Industries, a proprietorship owned by Noel J. Poux, and four affiliated Skyline corporations, set up *510a retirement plan for the benefit of certain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. GOLDMAN v. McShainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Paulish v. BakaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Karns v. Tony Vitale Fireworks Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Boron v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shoup v. ShoupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Nalbone v. Borough of YoungsvilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Steingrabe Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API