Legal Opinion

Caverly v. Stovall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 24, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Processioning. Before Judge Roan. DeKalb superior court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

1. In order for the owner of a tract of land to have the lines around the same surveyed and marked anew by proeessioners under Civil Code, § 3244 et seq., he must make application in- writing to the processioners of the district in which a portion or all of - the land is situated. Ballard v. Haines, 115 Ga. 847 (42 S. E. 218).

2. It is proper that one application be addressed to all three proeessioners; but the proceedings will not be unlawful if the applicant addresses a separate application to each of the proeessioners.

3. It is sufficient if such applications are sent to the proeessioners…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ballard v. HainesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Livingston v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Philpot v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  3. Alaculsey Lumber Co. v. FlemisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Bradley v. Chattanooga Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Henry v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API