Caverly v. Stovall
Supreme Court of Georgia
Processioning. Before Judge Roan. DeKalb superior court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.
1. In order for the owner of a tract of land to have the lines around the same surveyed and marked anew by proeessioners under Civil Code, § 3244 et seq., he must make application in- writing to the processioners of the district in which a portion or all of - the land is situated. Ballard v. Haines, 115 Ga. 847 (42 S. E. 218).
2. It is proper that one application be addressed to all three proeessioners; but the proceedings will not be unlawful if the applicant addresses a separate application to each of the proeessioners.
3. It is sufficient if such applications are sent to the proeessioners…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ballard v. HainesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
3Cited by7 opinions
- Livingston v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Philpot v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Alaculsey Lumber Co. v. FlemisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Bradley v. Chattanooga Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Henry v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.