Legal Opinion

People v. Whitehead

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1999No. Docket No. 203626PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBandstra, C.J.

INTRODUCTION

In Riverside Co v McLaughlin, 500 US 44, 56; 111 S Ct 1661; 114 L Ed 2d 49 (1991), the United States Supreme Court held that, following an arrest without a warrant, “a jurisdiction that provides judicial determinations of probable cause within 48 hours of arrest will, as a general matter, [be found to] comply with the promptness requirement” of the federal constitution’s Fourth Amendment. Police authorities who hold an arrestee for more than forty-eight hours without an arraignment can constitutionally do so only if they can “demonstrate the existence of a bona fide emergency or…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. ManningMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Sanders v. Detroit Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  3. People v. WhiteheadMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People of Michigan v. Andrew John-Lawrence LafeyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. People of Michigan v. Anthony CasanovaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API