Legal Opinion

Jose Lemus v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 16, 2016No. 12-73654PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PONSOR, Senior District Judge:

In Holder v. Martinez Gutierrez, 566 U.S. 583, 132 S.Ct. 2011, 182 L.Ed.2d 922 (2012), the Supreme Court unanimously held that the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) permissibly construed section 240A(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a), when it concluded that an alien seeking cancellation of removal had to satisfy the years-of-residence requirement on his own, without relying on a parent’s residential history. Id. at 2014-15. Petitioner Lemus contends that Martinez Gutierrez announced a new rule of law and that, under Chevron…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Hector Tito Lujan-Armendariz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Mauro Roldan-Santoyo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John Doe 1 v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Istvan Szonyi v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Felipe Betansos v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Istvan Szonyi v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. John Doe 1 v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API