Legal Opinion

Page v. Suraci

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 7, 1984No. 560-81PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The defendants appeal from a judgment by the trial court declaring: (1) that a corrective deed given by them to the plaintiffs was null and void and that the defendants had unlawfully trespassed by erecting a fence on the plaintiffs’ property, and (2) that the defendants had unlawfully interfered with the plaintiffs’ water supply.

The first issue on appeal is whether the plaintiffs accepted a corrective deed given by the defendants. The facts are as follows: The parties entered into a deposit receipt and sales agreement under which the plaintiffs were to purchase from the defendants a house…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bean v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  2. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. B. L. Allen, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  3. Blanchard v. VilleneuveSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of Sawyer Ex Rel. Howard Bank v. CrowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. In re R. A.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  3. In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2012
  4. Ernest v. AbareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  5. In Re RASupreme Court of Vermont · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API