Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Investors Syndicate

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWasservogel, J.

The allegation in the first defense that the agreement here involved “ is and always has been in all respects legal, valid and enforceable; that under the laws of the State of Minnesota which govern, plaintiff has no cause of action,” is but a legal conclusion. No facts from which such conclusion can be drawn are pleaded. The second defense is insufficient as a matter of law inasmuch as advice claimed to have been given to defendant by the Superintendent of Banks with respect to the legality of defendant’s transactions is not a defense to this action.

Motion to strike out both defenses…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morgenstern v. CohonNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. McGowan v. McGowanNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Monclova v. ArnettNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Morgenstern v. CohonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API