Legal Opinion

State v. an Xuan Nguyen

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 2008No. 27,032PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} In this appeal, we consider an issue of first impression: whether using a single interpreter to interpret for both Defendant, who is Vietnamese, and a Vietnamese juror, denied Defendant a fair trial so as to amount to fundamental or structural error. We also consider Defendant’s claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We conclude that, under the facts of this case, Defendant was not denied a fair trial because all testimony was translated for him, the interpreter was available to him at all times, he has not shown any prejudice, and his attorney…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States of America Ex Rel. Rogelio Nieves Negron v. The State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  3. State v. DeGraffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. RoybalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Martinez Chavez v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Linton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Gomez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  3. People v. GorgaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Huitron v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  5. Linton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API