Legal Opinion

Horton v. Schultz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1941No. 10902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Justice.

This suit was instituted by Herman Schultz against W. J. Horton and Hill E. Ratliff seeking to recover damages for injuries to his automobile alleged to have been caused by' defendants when a truck owned by defendants collided with plaintiff’s automobile upon a public highway.

The cause was submitted to a jury upon eighteen special issues and, in keeping with the answers of the jury, judgment was rendered in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $575.

W. J. Horton and Hill E. Ratliff have prosecuted this appeal.

Appellants first contend that it ■was reversible error for the trial court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Monzingo v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Northern Texas Traction Co. v. SingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. White v. Beaumont Implement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Texas Power & Light Co. v. HaleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Texas Power & Light Co. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Celanese Ltd. v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  2. Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. Naztec, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1990
  3. Boies v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Trotter v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1951
  5. Celanese Ltd., F/K/A Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group, Ltd. v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc. and Waste Management Industrial Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API