Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mercy Medical Center v. Julian

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 27, 2012No. Nos. 118, 119Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McDONALD, J.,

concurring and dissenting, in which BELL, C.J., and HARRELL, J., join.

These consolidated cases arise out of conflicting rulings by two judges of the same circuit court in separate parts of what is essentially the same litigation — a head-on collision of sorts. It was up to the Court of Special Appeals — and now us — to *381sort out who had the right of way and, more importantly, the rules of the road for similar cases in the future.

The majority opinion does a fine job of laying out the background of this case, tracing the history of the law of contribution, describing the Maryland…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Swigert v. WelkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Medical Center of Delaware, Inc. v. MullinsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. Adams v. NVR Homes, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  5. Scalf v. PayneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API