Brecher v. Brecher
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The concurring memorandum at the Appellate Division correctly concluded that ‘ ‘ the amendment of an answer to plead the statute before trial should liberally be granted to promote the legislative intent that employees should generally be compensated for their injuries through the exclusive remedy of the statute, but the court’s discretion still remains to deny the amendment where clear and disabling prejudice will be worked to the plaintiff.” The concurring Justice’s further conclusions that in this case no such prejudice existed, and that the discretion of the Trial Term was *988prop…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Murray v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Murray v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Masotti v. PetrozzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977