George A. O'brien, as of the Estate of William A. Harvard v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
We have concluded on the merits that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. Accordingly, we have directed the Clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties of this fact in writing. See Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court and Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804.
Sections 213(a) (2) and 223(c) (B) (1) (i) of the Social Security Act 1 provide that an employee is eligible to receive disability insurance benefits if he received $50 or more a quarter in twenty of the forty quarters preceding the disability. O’Brien brings this action as the executor…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Celeste R. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ulys Ingram v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Luis Velez v. Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Downing v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1975
- Bell v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1974
- Acevedo v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFAREDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.