Legal Opinion

Gulf Coast Research Lab. v. Amaraneni

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1998No. 91-CA-00172-SCTPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

722 So.2d 530 (1998)

GULF COAST RESEARCH LABORATORY, Harold D. Howse and David Cook

v.

Kumar AMARANENI, Administrator of the Estate of Amaraneni Venkataramiah, and G.J. Lakshmi.

No. 91-CA-00172-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

October 8, 1998.

Office of the Attorney General by Robert G. Jenkins, Lee Partee Gore, Attorneys for Appellants.

Earl L. Denham, Ocean Springs, Attorney for Appellees.

En Banc.

2Per curiam

¶ 1. A majority of the court agrees that the judgment of the trial court must be reversed but fails to agree on the disposition thereafter. Because we cannot agree on any instructions to guide the lower…

Also in this document: Dissent · McRAE; Dissent · Mills.

3Cases cited71 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Suddith v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISS.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
  2. Delta Regional Medical Center v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012
  3. Gulf Coast Research Laboratory v. AmaraneniMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Reid v. Mississippi State Hospital/Mississippi Department of Mental HealthCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  5. East Mississippi State Hospital v. Jimmy B. CallensMississippi Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API