Legal Opinion

Pya/Monarch, Inc. v. Higley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 29, 1995No. A95A1398, A95A1399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

In this interlocutory appeal, defendants PYA/Monarch, Inc. (“Monarch”), a food shipping business, and H. E. Hennigh, Inc. (“Hennigh”), an independent construction contractor, challenge the denial of their separate motions for summary judgment.

The underlying cause of action arose after a large, galvanized fence post being installed on Monarch’s property fell on plaintiff Edward Higley’s head while he was making a delivery to Monarch. It is undisputed that Monarch contracted with defendant Hennigh to make certain improvements to its property. The contract stated that Hennigh…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Barentine v. THE KROGER COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Peachtree-Cain Co. v. McBeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  5. Shansab v. HOMART DEVELOPMENT CO. INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kidd v. Dentsply International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Luther v. Wayne Frier Home Center of Tifton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Watkins v. First South Utility Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API