Pya/Monarch, Inc. v. Higley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal, defendants PYA/Monarch, Inc. (“Monarch”), a food shipping business, and H. E. Hennigh, Inc. (“Hennigh”), an independent construction contractor, challenge the denial of their separate motions for summary judgment.
The underlying cause of action arose after a large, galvanized fence post being installed on Monarch’s property fell on plaintiff Edward Higley’s head while he was making a delivery to Monarch. It is undisputed that Monarch contracted with defendant Hennigh to make certain improvements to its property. The contract stated that Hennigh…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Barentine v. THE KROGER COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Peachtree-Cain Co. v. McBeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Shansab v. HOMART DEVELOPMENT CO. INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kidd v. Dentsply International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Luther v. Wayne Frier Home Center of Tifton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Watkins v. First South Utility Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007