Legal Opinion
Hise v. Philip Morris Inc.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 29, 1999No. 4:98-cv-00947PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
H. DALE COOK, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the motions for summary judgment filed by defendants, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1
On December 15, 1998, plaintiffs filed the present action, purportedly on behalf of themselves and a class consisting of an estimated 40 million consumers of defendants’ tobacco products, pursuant to Rule 23. 2 Plaintiffs allege in their Complaint that defendants have engaged in, and are currently engaging in, certain unlawful activities arising out of, and related to, defendants’ performance of a settlement…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sanders v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- A.D. Bedell Wholesale Company, Inc. v. Philip Morris IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Mariana v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Table Bluff Reservation (Wiyot Tribe) v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.