Legal Opinion

Sauve v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying claimants’ motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim. The record demonstrates that the City police department and corporation counsel were aware within a few days of the accident both of the dangerous condition which caused the accident and of the occurrence of numerous accidents at the same site. Moreover, the City promptly investigated the scene, took photographs of it and subsequently received several notices of claim from other persons injured as a result…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gerzel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Barnes v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Passalacqua v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Jakubowicz v. Dunkirk Urban Renewal Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Board of Education of the School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Nickerson v. County of JeffersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API