Legal Opinion

Havens v. Howell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Action for breach of a covenant of seizin in a certain deed of January 1, 1931, made by the defendants to the plaintiff. An action for a breach of a covenant of seizin is available only to one who has received a deed to a parcel the title to which is in a third party and still continues in a third party at the time the action *807is brought for damages consequent upon the breach of covenant of seizin. (Fitch v. Baldwin, 17 Johns. 161.) While a breach of a covenant of seizin occurs at the time the deed containing it is delivered, if title be not in the grantor, the damages therefor become nominal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fitch v. BaldwinNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  2. Trustees of Freeholders & Commonalty of Southampton v. BettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Deschenes v. TallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Werner v. WheelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gonzales v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API