Legal Opinion

People v. Arcidicono

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 30, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum, Judgment of conviction affirmed.

In our opinion, defendant’s guilt of violating the Agriculture and Markets Law (§ 353) (failure to provide proper sustenance to an animal) was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Regardless of the possible culpability of the owners of the gelding, it was clearly established that defendant was in charge of feeding the gelding for the three months prior to its demise, that he was aware of its loss of weight, and that he gave it back to its owners in such a state of malnutrition that it was mercifully destroyed.

Although we are in agreement with the trial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. WrightAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. NewtonCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
  2. People v. SitorsNew York Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API