Legal Opinion

A. C. Lawrence Leather Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 7, 1925No. D-4PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, Judge

The claimant, being a tanner, engaged in the production of leather needed by the United States during the war and particularly as involved here, in the production of a special upper leather which shoe manufacturers under contract with the Government were being required to use in the manufacture of Army shoes. It was not a commercial product.

Conferences, correspondence, etc., which resulted in the claimant taking on this particular line of manufacture were with one Fred A. Vogel. Signatures to letters indicate that he was probably the chief of the upper leather section of the hide and leather…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goetz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  2. Roettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API