Legal Opinion

George v. City of Petoskey

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 1974No. Docket 17833PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. L. Smith, J.

On October 12, 1972, plaintiffs commenced suit by filing a two-count complaint against defendant. Count I alleged the defendant and its agents improperly interfered with plaintiffs’ enjoyment of their property, in that various city officials threatened potential renters of plaintiffs’ property that their use of the property would be in violation of zoning regulations, and that suit would be (and in fact was) instituted against them if they rented from plaintiffs. Plaintiffs allege special damages.

Count II repeated the allegations of Count I and added that defendant’s agents and officials had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Defnet v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Sweet v. ShreveMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Janiszewski v. BehrmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Schenburn v. Lehner Associates, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Case v. GorenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gordon v. City of WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  3. Citizens for Pre-Trial Justice v. GoldfarbMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Penn Central Corp. v. Checker Cab Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
  5. Male v. Mayotte, Crouse & D’haene Architects, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API