Legal Opinion

In Re Coverstone

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho

Decided April 21, 2011No. 09-02059PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

TERRY L. MYERS, Chief Judge.

Before the Court for confirmation is the amended chapter 13 1 plan of Debtors Val and Terese Coverstone (“Debtors”), Doc. No. 76 (“Plan”). The chapter 13 trustee (“Trustee”) objects to confirmation of the Plan under § 1325(b). 2 This Memorandum of Decision constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7052, 9014.

FACTS

Debtors filed a joint chapter 7 petition on July 15, 2009. They later converted their case to one under chapter 13 and filed a chapter 13 plan. See Doc. Nos. 26, 28 & 31. 3 The chapter 13 Plan…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Itule v. Heath (In Re Heath)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Zahn v. Fink (In Re Zahn)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. In Re EppersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Robert Balcom and Virginia Lee BalcomUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2021
  2. Michelle Amethystria CliffordUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API