In Re Coverstone
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
TERRY L. MYERS, Chief Judge.
Before the Court for confirmation is the amended chapter 13 1 plan of Debtors Val and Terese Coverstone (“Debtors”), Doc. No. 76 (“Plan”). The chapter 13 trustee (“Trustee”) objects to confirmation of the Plan under § 1325(b). 2 This Memorandum of Decision constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7052, 9014.
FACTS
Debtors filed a joint chapter 7 petition on July 15, 2009. They later converted their case to one under chapter 13 and filed a chapter 13 plan. See Doc. Nos. 26, 28 & 31. 3 The chapter 13 Plan…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Itule v. Heath (In Re Heath)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Zahn v. Fink (In Re Zahn)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- In Re EppersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jeffrey Robert Balcom and Virginia Lee BalcomUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2021
- Michelle Amethystria CliffordUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2022