Gigliobianco v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Dissent
LÓPEZ, Chief Justice,
dissenting.
For the reasons stated below, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the trial court did not err in overruling Gigliobianco’s Rule 403 objection to the admissibility of the breath test results. The majority concludes that the first three nonexclusive factors weigh in favor of admissibility. The primary stumbling block with regard to the second and third factors is language in Mechler1 which appears to dictate that these factors will always favor admissibility, truncating the need for any additional analysis regardless of the facts presented.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Solomon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- State v. MechlerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Bagheri v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.