Legal Opinion

Bartholomew v. Bartholomew

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1992No. Nos. 90-CA-2065, 90-CA-2066Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARMSTRONG, Judge.

Plaintiff, Margie Bartholomew, appeals from a judgment of separation from bed and board finding both she and defendant, James Bartholomew, at fault. James Bartholomew did not appeal or file an answer to his wife’s appeal. We now reverse.

Margie Bartholomew filed suit for separation on March 2, 1990, alleging nonsupport and cruel treatment. James Bartholomew filed a similar suit on March 8, 1990 alleging abandonment and cruel treatment.

The parties were married in 1954. At the time of the trial, Margie, age 53, and James, age 59, had been married thirty-six years. Two sons were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Kendrick v. KendrickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Adler v. AdlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Morgan v. MorganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Quinn v. QuinnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API