O'REILLY v. Balkwill
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradfield
Plaintiffs in error, who were plaintiffs below, seek review of a judgment of the district court declining to quiet title of plaintiffs in certain placer claims and tracts of land in the Hope Mining District, Lake County, Colorado, which the parties identify in their briefs as the “Placer Claims,” the “O’Reilly Tract” and the “Hill Tract,” but since plaintiffs O’Reilly claim title through conveyance from plaintiff Hill, we shall for convenience refer to them as the Placer Claims and the Hill Tract, and to the parties as plaintiffs and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ohio Oil Co. v. Wyoming AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- De Foresta v. GastSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. Clayton Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- Whitehead v. DesserichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Parker v. BettsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pepperdine v. KeysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- First National Bank of Wray v. McGinnisColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Lott v. Muldoon Road Baptist Church, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Lott v. Muldoon Road Baptist Church, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1970