Legal Opinion
Lai v. New York City Government
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 15, 1998No. 97 Civ. 2470(SAS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Katharine Lai filed a Complaint on April 8,1997, alleging that defendant New York City (“the City”) had violated her rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“the ADA”), 42 U.S.C.A. § 12132 (1997). On October 14, 1997, plaintiff moved to amend the Complaint. Apparently in anticipation of this motion being granted, plaintiff filed an amended Complaint, which adds two new plaintiffs and a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 12, 1997, the City moved for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. I need not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Joseph v. HymanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Katharine Lai v. New York City GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Potter v. City of LaceyWashington Supreme Court · 2024
- Stephen Williams v. Federal Aviation Administration, et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026