Harmon v. Flintham
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan. Action at law by Sarah J. Elintham, by Jennie Cook, her next friend, against Judson Harmon, receiver of the Pere Marquette Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
WARRINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This was an action for personal injuries, and resulted in a verdict and judgment against the receiver for $1,280. Defendant in error was injured June 6, 1906, at the railroad station in the village of Howell, Mich., situated on the Detroit Division of the Pere Marquette Railroad. This division extends from Grand Rapids to Detroit, was in possession of and operated by Hon. Judson Harmon, as receiver, and the action was brought against him in his official capacity. The track runs east and west at Howell, and the station is situated on the north side of the track. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Graham v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- McCabe & Steen Construction Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- McGearty v. Manhattan Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Erie R. v. RooneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Strait v. Yazoo & M. V. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. WillsieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Southern Pac. Co. v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913