Kintera, Inc. v. Convio, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL
PAPAS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant, Convio, Inc. (Convio) filed a motion to compel witness statements and internal email communications that were created by Plaintiff, Kintera, Inc. (Kintera). Kintera then filed a cross-motion to compel discovery of a document that was inadvertently produced by Defendant. For good cause appearing and for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Convio’s motion to compel and DENIES Kintera’s motion…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kelly v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
- Bank Brussels Lambert v. Credit Lyonnais (Suisse) S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- In Re Columbia/Hca Healthcare Corporation Billing Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stern v. O'QuinnDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Williams v. Sprint/United Management Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. ABM Industries Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
- JTR Enterprises, LLC v. An Unknown Quantity of Colombian Emeralds, Amethysts & Quartz CrystalsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.