Legal Opinion

United States v. Lee

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 29, 1983No. CM 442475Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MILLER, Senior Judge:

The appellant Lee and his cohort Wither-spoon * visited a reign of terror, sadism and *533humiliation upon their fellow soldiers. For his part in such sordid affairs, the appellant was charged with two specifications of forcible sodomy, one specification of extortion, two specifications of assault, and two specifications of communicating a threat. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, the appellant pled, and was found, guilty of the two forcible sodomies, extortion, and two assaults; the Government introduced no evidence concerning the two offenses of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CrouchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. CraneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. PetersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  4. United States v. MobleyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  5. United States v. WitherspoonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API