Unkel v. Robinson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
The complaint in this action alleged that defendant had, between the months of May and November, 1905, fraudulently procured from plaintiff various sums of money aggregating $4,020, which she had used in purchasing a house and lot in the city of Los Angeles, and that such fraud was not discovered by plaintiff until about November 1, 1905. The prayer was that it be declared that defendant held said real property as a trust for plaintiff for the amount of said $4,020; that said property be sold and that the said amount so fraudulently procured from plaintiff be paid to him from the proceeds of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- City of Oakland v. CarpentierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Moore v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Castro v. GeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Security First National Bank v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bradley Bros. v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Calkins v. CalkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.