Legal Opinion

Di Vosta v. Boam Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 24, 1959No. 58-582PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The court has carefully considered the assignments of error, briefs, the record of the proceedings below, and oral argument of counsel for the respective parties. The burden here of clearly demonstrating error is upon the appellants. We conclude they have failed to carry that burden and failing so to do, the judgment appealed should be and it is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cleeland v. Miami Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Lemay v. GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Reefer Transportation, Inc. v. HoffmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965