Legal Opinion

Hightower v. Scarborough

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 31, 1949No. 32371PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

A plaintiff can not recover except upon the cause of action as laid in his petition. If the.pleader had intended the suit as one upon quantum meruit, that is, for services rendered, independently of the contract to compensate-him at the rate of $60 per month, all that would have been necessary would have been a short petition alleging that the services were rendered, their value, and that the plaintiff had not been paid for them, together with a bill of particulars of the services rendered, or averments in the petition showing when and how the services were rendered. It would not have been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BuiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Henderson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Graham v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gayle v. GrecoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  2. Abernathy v. PutnamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. E. H. Siler Realty & Business Broker, Inc. v. DartyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Maher v. Associated Video, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Weldon v. LashleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API