Legal Opinion

Peyton v. Young

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

659 S.W.2d 205 (1983)

Gary PEYTON and Joseph Peyton, Movants,

v.

Mark YOUNG, Administrator of the Estate of Phyllis Hill, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

November 2, 1983.

William R. Whitledge, Madisonville, for movants.

Ronald K. Bruce, Madisonville, for respondent, Mark Young.

Richard A. Dennis, Asst. U.S. Atty., Louisville, for respondent, I.R.S.

Joe A. Evans, III, Madisonville, for respondent, Madisonville Bldg. & Loan.

James C. Brantley, Dawson Springs, for respondent, estate of William Hill.

LEIBSON, Justice.

The Estate of Phyllis Hill appealed from a judgment directing distribution…

Also in this document: Dissent · Wintersheimer; Dissent · Wintersheimer.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnett, Admr. v. Couey, Admr.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Hoffmann v. NewellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Cowan v. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  4. Barton v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  5. Peyton v. YoungKentucky Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API