Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1924No. Nos. 24361, 24279PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

The appellant was convicted of having intoxicating liquors in his possession exceeding one quart in quantity. The appellant was a merchant in the town of Newton, and ran a store ill the limits of said town. The town marshal procured a warrant to search appellant’s premises for intoxicating liquors, and went to the store of appellant and asked him if he had any whiskey, and Davison replied that he did not. The marshal then asked him if he had any “jake,” meaning any Jamaica ginger or essence of ginger, and Davison told him that he did, and the marshal requested Davison to show what he had, and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Intoxicating-Liquor CasesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. State v. BancroftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. Holmes v. . CarleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. King v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Bertrand v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Furst v. ShowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  3. Bowman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Billington v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  5. McConnon & Co. v. MeadowsMississippi Supreme Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API