Legal Opinion

Gray v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 2000No. 99 CA 0304Published

1Opinion of the Court

I,KUHN, Judge.

This appeal presents a res nova issue interpreting Louisiana’s anti-stacking law: when an insured sustains injury while operating a leased vehicle, which is a “temporary substitute automobile” for one of the insured’s “owned” automobiles, is the insured allowed to stack the UM coverage of another policy issued to the insured on a different “owned” vehicle? In this instance, the trial court concluded stacking is allowed, based on the statutory exception in La. R.S. 22:1406(D)(l)(e). We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Nadine Gray, filed suit against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nall v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. Courville v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  3. Capone v. KingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Boullt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  5. Pardue v. DeanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API