Legal Opinion

Brash v. White

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1890No. Civil No. 264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Pinal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

This is an action by the. plaintiff against defendant for damages claimed to have been suffered by reason of the defendant cutting an irrigating ditch of plaintiff and diverting water therefrom, thereby injuring the crop of plaintiff. It is insisted by defendant (appellant), first, that there was no substantial damages proven on the trial below. The evidence does disclose the fact that the plaintiff on the trial below testified that White (defendant), without his (plaintiff’s) permission, puts dams in the ditch and diverted water from May 11th to June 1st nearly all the time, and that…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Snyder v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Snyder v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API