Legal Opinion

Coffman v. City of Wichita

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 20, 1958No. Civ. A. T-1566PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Chief Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment action instituted by the plaintiffs individually and as a group under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act of June 14, 1934, 48 Stat. 955, as amended, 68 Stat. 890 (1954), 28 U.S.C. § 2201, to have certain condemnation proceedings, involving property owned separately by them, initiated by the defendant declared null and void on the ground that the proceedings did not comply with the due process requirements of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Aetna Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  5. Joy v. HagueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Demarco v. EdensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Ralph H. Duggins v. Joe B. Hunt, S-R Insurance Service Agency, Inc., a Corporation, and Carr Insurance Agency, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  3. Lipsett v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  4. Ahoyian v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962
  5. Coffman v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API