George v. Lindberg
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
DEVITT, District Judge.
The United States has brought an order to show cause as to why Emery Lindberg, a bartender, and Gustav A. Bodin, a clean-up man, should not be required to answer questions before an agent of the Internal Revenue Service in connection with an investigation of the possible occupational tax stamp liability of their employer, one Gordon E. Triemert, owner and operator of the Anchor Inn, a Minneapolis bar. On May 9, 1955 these two men appeared before the Internal Revenue Agent in response to a summons (issued pursuant to § 7602 of the 1954 Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.