Legal Opinion
Del Raine v. Adams
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 20, 2003No. 02-55054; D.C. No. CV-00-08142-GAFPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Federal prisoner Ronald Del Raine appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, challenging a decision by the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We affirm.
Del Raine contends that the Commission erred in computing his mandatory early release hearing date pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4206(d).
Del Raine may not challenge the execution of his sentence in the instant 28 U. S.C. § 2241 petition because his claims are barred as successive. See § 2244(a) (stating that a federal court is not required…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Raymond E. Hill v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- (HC) Dunlap v. ArvizaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Ader O.L. v. Warden, California City Immigration Center, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Del Raine v. HaroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Guang Ju Lin v. Doerer, WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Vi Kiet Victor Diep v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026