Monson v. Carlstrom
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Coiurt. — Hon. Erank H. Gaynor, Judge. Action to recover a reasonable commission in the sum of $125, under contract for procuring the' purchaser to whom defendant effected a sale of real property. The allegations of plaintiff’s petition were denied, and there was a trial to a jury, resulting in a verdict for defendant. From the judgment entered on such verdict plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the Court
McClain, J. —
No portion of the evidence is set ont in the abstract, and the only questions presented for our consideration involve the correctness of the instructions. Plaintiff alleged that under a contract with defendant he procured, as purchasers for defendant’s property, two persons named. The court instructed the jury that the contract between plaintiff and defendant was established without controversy, and that it appeared from the evidence that defendant had conveyed the property described in plaintiff’s petition to one of the persons named by plaintiff; and the court then told the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Schwabe v. EstesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
- Bente v. BodenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Kruse v. HauserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912