Legal Opinion

(PC) Camposeco v. Stamper

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 22, 2019No. 1:19-cv-01330Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SAMUEL CAMPOSECO, Case No. 1:19-cv-01330-BAM (PC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ADD CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS 9 v. 10 BOUDREAUX, et al., (ECF No. 10) 11 Defendants. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 12 13 Plaintiff Samuel Camposeco (“Plaintiff”) is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in 14 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint has 15 not yet been screened. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to add claims against 16 defendants, filed October 15,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API